Authentic voices. Remarkable stories. AOL On Originals showcase the passions that make the world a more interesting place.
James Franco loves movies. He loves watching them, acting in them, directing them, and even writing them. And now, he’s going to take some of his favorite movie scenes from the most famous films of all time, and re-imagine them in ways that only James can.
Go behind the scenes with some of the biggest digital celebrities to see what life is like when the blogging and tweeting stops.
The story of punk rock singer Laura Jane Grace of Against Me! who came out as a woman in 2012, and other members of the trans community whose experiences are woefully underrepresented and misunderstood in the media.
Documentary shorts conceived of and directed by famous actors. Jeff Garlin, Katie Holmes, Alia Shawkat, Judy Greer, and James Purefoy
Park Bench is a new kind of "talking show" straight from the mind of born and bred New Yorker and host, Steve Buscemi.
Digital influencer Justine Ezarik (iJustine) is back. After covering the world of wearable tech last season, iJustine is expanding her coverage this year by profiling the hottest tech trends across the country.
A 12 episode documentary series following 5 startup companies competing in the 2013 San Francisco TechCrunch Disrupt Startup Battlefield as they fine tune their products and eventually present in front of a panel of judges in hopes of winning $50,000 in funding.
Enter the graceful but competitive world of ballet through the eyes of executive producer, Sarah Jessica Parker. This behind-the-scenes docudrama reveals what it takes to perform on the ultimate stage, the New York City Ballet. Catch NYCB on stage at Lincoln Center.
Nicole Richie brings her unfiltered sense of humor and unique perspective to life in a new series based on her irreverent twitter feed. The show follows the outspoken celebrity as she shares her perspective on style, parenting, relationships and her journey to adulthood.
Explore what it means to be human as we rush head first into the future through the eyes, creativity, and mind of Tiffany Shlain, acclaimed filmmaker and speaker, founder of The Webby Awards, mother, constant pusher of boundaries and one of Newsweek’s “women shaping the 21st Century.”
Gwyneth Paltrow and Tracy Anderson spend time with women who've overcome hardship, injury, and setbacks to triumph in the face of adversity.
Hank Azaria’s touching, humorous, and often enlightening journey from a man who is not even sure he wants to have kids, to a father going through the joys, trials and tribulations of being a dad.
Tara Malloy, senior counsel at The Campaign Legal Center, explains the charges against former presidential candidate John ...
Edwards and the legal challenges ahead for government prosecutors. (April 23)
Grab video code:
[Notes:WASHINGTON. SOURCE: AP 4/23/12][Notes:SOT: TARA MALLOY - Senior Counsel, The Campaign Legal Center]At the heart of this case is whether almost one million dollars of payments made to benefit Edwards by essentially allowing that Rielle Hunter, his mistress, would be cared for, should be considered a personal gift to Edwards or a campaign contribution to his presidential campaign in 2008. They have to prove most basically that it was a contribution. And here there is no allegation as far as Im aware that Edwards personally, physically received the checks. So instead, the government will have to show that Ms. Mallon, one of his benefactors, coordinated her expenditures with Edwards. That means, first, it had to be an expenditure under the law, secondly, they have to show that the expenditure was coordinated with Edwards, that it wasn't completely done without his knowledge or cooperation. So these two elements they have to show in order to prove that his campaign took this contribution in violation of federal law. More specifically the problem is that under federal law, a campaign can only accept a very limited contribution of under 3-thousand dollars. And here we're talking about over 700-thousand just from Ms. Mellon alone. So that was one problem. The second problem is of course that the Edwards campaign did not reveal or disclose as they were required to under the law, these payments. No doubt because they wanted to keep this entire affair secret, but nonetheless there are two big potential violations of campaign finance law. I think this is going to be, as I said, a tough job for the government. You know, a lot of legal commentators have said that this is a distortion of campaign finance law or that this is something questionable about the actual legal theory. I dont think the legal theory is questionable. It's fairly established that a coordinated expenditure with the campaign constitutes a contribution under federal campaign finance law. However, the difficulty here is going to be compiling the evidence necessary to prove that this type of payment was indeed for campaign purposes. (****END****) ANCHOR VOICE: -------------------------VIDEO PRODUCER: matt friedman---------------------------VIDEO SOURCE: ap